Consensus of Dependent Opinions
نویسندگان
چکیده
Providing opinions through labeling of images, tweets, etc. have drawn immense interest in crowdsourcing markets. This invokes a major challenge of aggregating multiple opinions received from different crowd workers for deriving the final judgment. Generally, opinion aggregation models deal with independent opinions, which are given unanimously and are not visible to all. However, in many real-life cases, it is required to make the opinions public as soon as they are received. This makes the opinions dependent and might incorporate some bias. In this paper, we address a novel problem, hereafter denoted as dependent judgment analysis, and discuss the requirements for developing an appropriate model to deal with this problem. The challenge remains to be improving the consensus by revealing true opinions.
منابع مشابه
Minimum cost consensus models based on random opinions
In some complex group decision making cases, the opinions of decision makers (DMs) present random characteristic. However, it is difficult to determine the range of opinions by knowing only their probability distributions. In this paper, we construct cost consensus models with random opinions. The objective function is obtaining the minimum consensus budget under a certain confidence level. Non...
متن کاملOpinions of experts from Asia on the diagnosis and treatment of pemphigus vulgaris
Background and aim: Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is the most common blistering disease in Iran and many other Asian countries with a relatively high incidence and involvement of both skin and mucous membrances in majority of patients. The aim of this study was to assess the opinions of Asian experts on the diagnosis and management of PV. Materials and Methods: A questinnaire-based mailed/emailed sur...
متن کاملAbout the Power to Enforce and Prevent Consensus by Manipulating Communication Rules
We explore the possibilities of enforcing and preventing consensus in continuous opinion dynamics that result from modifications in the communication rules. We refer to the model of Weisbuch and Deffuant, where n agents adjust their continuous opinions as a result of random pairwise encounters whenever their opinions differ not more than a given bound of confidence ε. A high ε leads to consensu...
متن کاملZaller-Deffuant model of public opinion
Recent formulation of the Zaller model of mass opinion is generalized to include the interaction between agents. The mechanism of interaction is close to the bounded confidence model. The outcome of the simulation is the probability distribution of opinions on a given issue as dependent on the mental capacity of agents. Former result was that small capacity leads to a strong belief into random ...
متن کاملدیدگاه ها و چالش های موجود در تشکیل معاونت سلامت در دانشگاه علوم پزشکی و خدمات بهداشتی درمانی تهران: یک مطالعه دلفی
The purpose of this study was the creation and measurement of consensus regarding formation of a new Department of Health in Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS). Using a three-iteration Delphi procedure, consensus was built and measured among experts on different aspects of a possible merger between the current Medical Care and Health Care Departments and the formation of a new Depart...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- CoRR
دوره abs/1609.01408 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016